>>1557693This, very nicely put.
>>1557706Indeed, what would I care what they want to do with their body? But then here we are, minding our own business, pointing out a man dressed as a woman that's dressed as a man, or something close to that, and get informed that the man is a woman, but yet a man. I'm only here to defend taxonomical systems and syntax. If those lose solid meaning then precision communication and classification becomes impossible, and thus the entirety of science and it's methods break down. Fuck that, not on my watch. Oh, and last night there was the mention of me and my "conservative rags" or whatever, which couldn't be more wrong, so there's that. I don't read any "rags" whatsoever, I just read Peterson and Audubon field guides, and "wilderness survival" shit, and haven't had TV since 1993, I'd even voted in my first eligible pres election for Bill Clinton's first term (last time I ever voted for pres until third party in the big Trump/Clinton one. Why? I started reading shitloads of books, baby!)