Im really grateful for the insight, and output from the board. Thank you!
>>91488Im not trying to write like Nietzsche, and the "far flung" aspect of it comes off from the fact that im bilingual, and half the time im translating thought from my first language, secondly, a well versed philosophical dictionary is more used to illustrate specific thought, and negate the possibility of synonyms and homonyms.
And the manifesto is from this group -to- a serious philosophical faculty. Not the other way around. It will, in turn, serve as a monument to /out/.
From /out/ to /out/.
>>91420>>91435I really, really like this idea, and this helped out a lot! Ok, express your instances, views, experiences, hopes, dreams (in which ever form you want it) and keep it as clear and simple as possible, so that people can agree with you, if they do, than its going in!
>>91297Well that was my own thought, personal and presented in a philosophical form. That being said, i do believe that it represents, or could, represent /out/ view on life.
That aside, each and every though should be: critiqued, analyzed, synthesized, organized and implemented. Nothing makes its way "in" out of the blue.
>>91294>>91291>>91287This is good, this has a lot of possibilities to work with. It has good topics to work with, and i like the motifs. That being said, im going to need some kind of consensus from the board.
My personal view is that humans are not social animals, but dependent (greedy) animals, and that that can be misconstrued as socializing.
Food for thought: every socializing event at its core has a fruit to bear (even if its just feeling good), while goats and sheep are always in herds, regardless of the wants and needs.
>Humans are greedy and sheep are social. This is Hobbes' view. In a nutshell.