>>1246549Wall of text before bed:
>Minimize scientific theoryYou’ve got to hit each point, running to an appeal to authority does nothing to convince anyone. Target selection and airburst detonation absolutely do limit suspended particulate matter in the atmosphere. This has been tested: see the lack of gaping craters in the ground when we didn’t want them. If I wanted to minimize I’d say that ‘this theory was crocked up by the scientific community (which seems to show a strange predisposition towards sexual control fantasies *see Google AI dev) as a goal line defense to dissuade the opinion that a nuclear war between the powers was winnable, after their morally bankrupt actions during Manhattan. That it hides behind the language of “theory”, as these types are wont to do.
>it’s war Assumption, maybe it’s a rehearsed targeted elimination scheme, you utilize suspension of belief about human nature a hell of a lot yourself.
Regardless, we can go around and around and neither will convince the other. The comfiest board on the whole site suffers while this continues (this thread should have been deleted yesterday, belongs on /pol/), and if I don’t get this ham fried and to bed, I go back to jail. Good arguing with you, you insufferable cunts.
