>>91225You are correct, but its not "just" about nature. Sure, its the main subject, but i would go so far as to try and integrate ghillie suits and crisps, you know?
All the way down to things quite absurd as: fuck a girl in the woods is just fine, but eating her out is wrong, because of reasons.
Anything, no matter how "weird" as long as its corroborated. I would personally like people to express their "secret" views, phobias, paranoias, hopes, ideas, fantasies etc, because you can bleed philosophy from everything.
You are right that i don't want another: lel save teh whales, brochure. Even though i have a fascination with whales, this is supposed to be something completely new, something raw, something out-of-the-box, not guided, active-not-reactive etc. etc.
Right now i would love to hear the views on human nature, before we go down to humans in nature. If someone has any specific ontological or metaphysical arguments that they want to stress (god made us, evolution, big bang etc) i would love to hear them.
This "codex" should be "social acid in font". Throw convention out the window, and feel free to state that you value a good solid bush-craft knife more than your uncle.
