>>2640217>Globally distributed dendrochronology records, ice core records, lacustrine sediment records, and even historical recordsyeah and this evidence has literally proven you wrong multiple times, just look at
>>2640090>>2640104so why do keep saying this
>>2640217 when your own evidence is proof you're wrong ????? you don't even understand what you are posting because you didn't read the whole story... like do you understand that area A was hot BUT area B was cold ??? thus the global climate was not "hot" but just more extreme ???
do you have any else beside conspiracy theories sucking big oil/coal dick? are you so dumb that you're falling for the actual conspiracies protecting profits of big companies, OPEC and polluters like china?
