>>2281772>No I didn't. Nobody has done that to me, as I clearly told you multiple timesThis is a case of
>what about when you do it>what I do is completely different! I am nothing like the people I criticize >Because I asked a direct question about what he said.And then proceeded to answer it yourself.
which I pointed out
>which you said is fine because >You explained this rhetorical device yourself, obviously you understand it, so don't start complaining about it now.>I am not on edge. It is easy to see that people frequently interpret the minority voice in a thread as upset or angry. I didn't say you were upset or angry, you are on edge.
Evident by comments like
>Why do you think providing information you don't like is "an effort to combat everyone who mentions how they grow"? Because the information is useful, and you don't like that. You want everyone to struggle the way you do>and you get pissy and shit up the thread with butthurt faggotry.The fact you say that you aren't on edge while saying shit like that shows me you are either in denial, or so defensive at this point that you must defend yourself against all perceived attacks by a group of people out to get you.
P.S It has nothing to do with frequent responses, that wasn't even on my radar.
I'v seen this shit before. Essentially there is no room for even the possibility that you are wrong about anything, be it your methods for gardening, your posting style, nothing. You must be right, you must defend everything, attack back, be relentless.
I know what a civil discussion is. I know what relaxed people talk like. This isn't it.
