>>2510375I don't need google or kike funded studies pushing an agenda to teach me that it's a completely illogical premise. If a 0.5 degree change in temperature over the span of 30 years is enough to cause the deer tick population to go from non-existent to problematic, then it logically follows that 30 years ago, anywhere with the same climate that we have now would have had a problematic deer tick population, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE, you dumb fucking retard.
