>>1021687>packs have an industry standard size that's been the industry standard since the early 60's>they're usually elastic or elastic mesh>but this one comparatively new (1995 I think) product simply doesn't work in itGreat design there, surely it's the user's or the pack's fault right?
>this one bottle breaks when setting a pack down on it, even though pretty much every backpacker ever sets their pack down this way because literally no other water bottle is that fragile>not to mention due to the placement of the pockets so you can actually reach them without taking it off, they're in danger from incidental slips, trips, falls, or packs falling over once set downWoo 2 for 2 on brilliant design features so far!
>due to total lack of rigidity even when full, they cannot be replaced in these industry-standard water bottle pockets without taking the pack offAaand 3 for 3 amirite?
Face it. They're not a good do-all water bottle. They have niche uses where they're very good, sure, but they are by no means a straight upgrade over any other water bottle.
I also don't understand how they're as fragile as they are. It's the same thickness of the same plastic used in Camelbak bladders welded together in the same way, yet I can fucking sit on one a bare Camelbak bladder and it won't pop.
