>>1027221Wow, even with all that searching, you still failed to provide one ahead of evidence. The only point you made is "bears can be killed".
The polar bear? They're near point blank range and it's swimming "like shooting fish in a barrell" they can literally walk up to it and fire at it with no danger to themselves and it STILL can swim and make it ashore.
The spear? Not a gun, does not bolster your argument. You say an 1880s rifle negates my study but somehow a 3000 year old weapon like a spear makes yours better?
The bows? Still not a gun. Hunting a bear is much different than a bear being aggressive and charging. Once again, wrong weapon, and hunting is nowhere near the same as encountering an aggressive bear. A bow used for thousands of years makes you right but an 1880s rifle makes me wrong?
The one video you did post about killing a charging bear with a gun? There's a minimum of 3 people firing at it in a largr clearing, while they are well aware of the bear, shooting it from a distance and it still makes it 10 yards or more.
The video of the grizzly being shot at a distance and bleeding all over? This helps my argument tremendously. The bear is mortally wounded and still charges full speed ahead for hundreds of yards despite losing massive amounts of blood, and that's with a good broadside kill shot
Man. It's like you know you're wrong, and realize you can't prove otherwise...oh wait, you can't.
You showed one video of a group of men, all with guns, killing a charging bear they were aware of, taking multiple shots to kill it, in a wide open area. None of that applies to the vast majority of aggressive bear encounters.
Wow, you're worse than I even expected for a hippie.
