>>108177You are citing the thoughts of certain legal philosophers (natural rights and property ownership) and scoff at me refefencing others?
Please, don't be a pleb, at least research private ownership and the development of the concept before spouting this kind of bullshit
It makes you look unintelligent and uninformed
In many states land is taxed not at the value of what is on it , but on the value of what could be on it.
The basic concept of american property ownership in the calssical sense is that the land is public, but the fruits of your labor is yours.
Putting posts is a type of improvement, but not enough to warrant perpetual private posession.
You are granted reprieve from public posession in order to extract useful goods from the land you are given for a brief period of time, if you do not do so, you are obligated (in the theoretical sense) to revert it back to the state.
