>>1285716check the scientific literature on this friend. it's a meme second only to vaccine's and pre/postnatal autism.
like that heavily flawed and un-reproducible study, the aluminum/alzheimer's study goes back to 1965 when rabbits were meticulously poisoned with aluminum and a correlating brain neuron pathology was observed. a link to alzheimer's wasn't established and the criteria for establishing causation was never met, all that study did was establish plausibility (which is the hallmark pitfall of scientific research - plausibility is almost always proven false by subsequent studies and yet it's always clung to by the general public who do not usually understand the scientific discipline being researched). as such, the aluminum/alzheimer's study has not been found to have any consistent or reliable reproducibility, and the subsequent studies into the correlation observed in rabbits have had no consistency and have not been generalizable to humans or to other studies. also, the various methods of absorbing aluminum toxicity that have been studied are inconsistent and implausible when considering the ways humans are exposed to it (cookware, etc).
in short, until all the pseudoscience and research flaws are finally hashed out of this already exhausted topic, the concern is less about demonstrating "how aluminum correlates with alzheimer's", but actually demonstrating "how aluminum does not correlate with alzheimer's". typically when a flawed study is given public attention it takes 10-15 years for the myth to go away, even if subsequent studies repeatedly disprove it.
>reference of interest:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4131942/>see also: climate change denial 
