>>1284177yes please do. i can't praise the cabelas CGR for this enough, it's a great price point (you will never find a better bang/buck ratio for a glass 2 weight)
throw a true-to-weight 2 weight line on there and a small reel, and go to town
>>1284189>>1284180sounds like you just suck desu
my 2 weight i have used to effectively throw up to size 6 wooly buggers. foam bluegill bugs are no issue, my micro clousers are effortless, and i've even used it for indicator fishing
>>1284184here's what a 3 weight does better than a 2 weight
>the difference between a 2 weight and a 3 weight is 20 grains over a span of 30 feet. if changing from a 2 weight to a 3 weight feels like a life changing experience, then you were probably using a shitty 2 weight. i mean seriously, if going from a line that weighs 80 grains in the first 30 feet, to a line that weighs 100 grains in the first 30 feet (that's 5.1 grams to 6.4 grams if you dont know grains) is a life changing event, then you probably are either just the biggest autist in the world, or the one that was liked less just happened to be shitty.
a 3 weight vs a 2 weight will
>still have trouble with wind>still have trouble throwing a really long cast>still have a reasonably delicate presentation>still feel like not enough rod if you hook anything over a poundalmost everyone agrees that the difference between single rod weights is negligable, i mean, if you're debating between a 2 weight and a 4 weight, then you will notice a very clear difference in casting power, and presentation, but a 2 weight vs a 3 weight is just autistic.
>>1284474yeah, sorry, can't help you with that. all i know about japan is that the porn has to have a little sensor bar that does nothing to cover anything up.
