>>1317279But that's the dealio here, senpai. I don't consider myself so important to think that my actions have any impact on Mother Earth in 500M years. Species go, and will keep going extinct for various reasons.
>>1317280>You're avoiding the argument.I was pretty clear already, you being an elected bureaucrat doesn't give you the power to have access to something that your people doesn't have. That's my view.
>Except there's an incentive to do it anyways, people might like some rabbit.Who doesn't like some stewed rabbit? That's not the point, the point is that you're forbidding people from doing something because you think they may act in a bad way. You're assuming the worst of them rather than giving them the benefit of doubt.
>Your point?My point is that a species can both go extinct by hunting them same way it can go extinct because you destroyed an entire valley to build some damn.
> The less species we have total the less of a chance that more will comeNo, it would be Mother Earth "healing" itself all over again, like in the beginning of times. Look at where we began, why do you give man so much credit? Dinosaurs laugh at your claim.
>>1317280>HumanityThat's irrelevant, Earth is 4 billion years old.
>We don't want you here in the civilised world.Based scandi sense of superiority strikes again.
