>>132130>You don't have to be pro-gun.It's be pro gun or be silent, hardly a good situation
>If you are vocally anti-gun, however, you've just started a gun control debate which certainly belongs on either /k/ or (moreso) /pol/. The gun control debate affects /out/ activity & as such is /out/ related. Similarly being anti hunting
>Because hunting (and guns, which are implicit in hunting) is a board-approved topic,Who exactly approved that? Is there any proof that suggestions submitted for the sticky were included on a representative basis? Why not live in the real world rather than that of the sticky?
>it is allowed.Well ok then, if that's your attitude the sticky makes no mention of anti-hunting sentiment being banned, therefore it must not be. Similarly we can dispense with boards like /n/ & /o/ because everything they discuss must be out related.
>The debates that don't belong here only begin if someone starts spouting anti-gun things in a hunting thread which was previously firmly on-topic.No, that's not true. A thread can be on any subject then some tool will turn up & start saying to do X activity you need a gun (which is patently untrue)
