I didn't read the OP, but these infographics bother me. I feel like a professor must feel in reading a Wikipedia article written about his subject area of specialization. There are things that are generally correct, but there is so much that is so wrong.
>>134324>1 & 6 are going to be very difficult, if not impossible to keep taught unless you have a shaped tarp (protip: you don't). >2 can be done without logs, and won't pull taught if it's just a square or rectangle.>3 & 5 are not full shelters. One is only for breaking strong wind, and the other is a tent fire waiting to happen.>4 is retarded because it uses a cord under the tarp without bothering to tie it somewhere secure like to the edge of the tarp for instance. In wind, there is nothing to keep the tarp from shifting around on that center cord>>134327Move #7 to the #4 spot and take 4-6 off the list. 8-10 do not belong either, as they cannot create fire on their own.
>>134334This fanciful Benchmade advertisement belongs in the pages of Maxim magazine. Did any of us really need to read that to know that you can use a knife to clean game or cut cordage?
>>134360With a big enough filter, yeah it's fine to use natural materials, but when most people go missing, they won't have plastic bags handy that are capable of withstanding the weight of all the wet filter materials and water it will take to make a suitable water filter out of natural materials, also many people go missing without a source of fire, and without charcoal that filter loses a whole lot of effectiveness.
>>134414Not nearly enough info there for the average non-botanist to identify those plants or know where to find them.
>>134416Survival?
>>134669Tarp origami. Completely useless to an outdoorsman who doesn't want to get rained on or have his tarp sail away in a light wind.
>>134753>using the pitch that provides the least coverage possible>making camp on a creek's flood benchwtf r u doin, m8
