>>1404194>Pay your local park fees it makes a difference. I do (as I have already said several times)...
But localizing taxes around these kind of public spaces is unjust and inefficient. It's unjust, because low income areas are unable to fund said public entity to the same degree as more affluent areas (this same dynamic plays out in our public schools, further exacerbating wealth/class inequalities). It is also inefficient in that people overwhelmingly vote against tax plans that do not benefit them directly, and since /out/-stuff is niche already, this means preserving/maintaining wild areas will forever be a low priority.
>>1404195>It doesn't intentionally discriminate against whites.I literally said it was not intentional in my post? But intent is irrelevant in this case, because the outcome unfairly targets a specific group.
>But thank you for playingI'd recommend you spend less time "playing" and more time improving your reading comprehension skills.
>>1404248>Also, considering that NPS and USFS are partnering with companies like REI to try and increase minority /out/ activity you can't even argue that it unfairly targets whites because they're literally actively trying to get non-whites to go /out/ and pay thus pay the same fees.This is nonsense. A half-assed virtue signal by a few globalist corporations is not a solution.
>But please, don't let me ruin your game of "I'm the most oppressed!" I know it's a favorite pastime of self-absorbed millennials.Oppression (like most things in life) is relative to the individual. It isn't a competition. It's simply acknowledging injustice when you see it.
