>>1415802Retards who took something I could get behind and turned it into something I would take up arms against if it ever took
>ban animal testing Human life > animal life, every time. should we be force feeding rats lip balm to make sure the cheaper chemicals don't give little Suzy a tummy ache when she sneaks into mommy's purse and eats the whole tube? Probably not. Should we test a new medicine on animals before we test on humans to make sure the side effects dont include death and suffering? Absolutely.
>deth penalty for animal abusersNo for the same reason as above as well as a huge overclassification of animal abuse by this type of person, I believe actual animal abuse is deplorable and should be responded to with harsh punishment however I also raise livestock and have been accused of animal cruelty myself for necessary practices.
>ban kosher/halal slaughter Okay
>end consumerism To what end? There is no clear end point for this type of reform.
>reforest the landGreat idea, but to what extent? Deforested land has been deforested for a reason. Where do we make the cuts, food production? Reasource production? Housing development? Also putting trees in dirt is a good first step but we need more than just trees to call it good, what species do we add? Are we okay with reintroducing predators/mega fauna that present a threat to humans? Will these species be able to survive in the allotted reforested land?
>deportation/overpopulation Love the idea of deportation, but how does it solve overpopulation? You have to end lives to depopulate not move them around. How do we decide who dies, and how do we enforce population control measures to stop it from growing again?
>limit technology To what end? Stone age? Copper age? How much is too much and how much is not enough?
