>>1464814I don't know much about history, so this is mostly my intuition, but argument is that those revolutions didn't try to change society in an intellectual manner the way the Unamurderer did. Even Communism didn't try to change the hearts and minds of people. The Communist revolution leaders tried to change government and then force communism upon people. And I'd guess that in most of those revolutions, the "common people" were revolting because they were being highly oppressed and facing things like poverty, unemployment and starvation. They weren't doing it for some idea of completely changing the value of society.
And revolutions always failed at achieving their goals, unless the goal was something simple like removing a foreign power. I don't think you can really change society through force. You can force things upon people but that's not the same thing. You can try but you'll fuck a lot of shit up. Most of the positive things in society have been reached through organic evolution over time.
Also we live in an age where it's harder than ever to have a revolution because governments are so powerful and society is so complex. In the west people live pretty good and don't want to turn to violent anarchy where people die in the streets, when we can [at least somewhat for now] vote on things and have at least SOME hope for the future.
>>1464815Sorry brainlet, I shouldve said "novel or movie" even though I clearly meant novels because I gave 3 different novels as examples. Most people don't wanna read some 40,000 page acedemic essay from a guy that didn't even have a realistic solution
