>>1539240For some reason, the next part to this, which I clearly recall having typed, is not here. But it said something to the effect of:
"This, of course, would require significant population reduction to achieve, so we release nanobots that sterilize anyone with DNA or other physiological signatures of low IQ and those lacking the "empathy" gene. So we sculpt population numbers without the need for killing, and one then has the choice of working and living in a variety of ways, with far less competition, including being fully allowed to go and live in any designated wild space, provided they respect a few sensible long term preservation rules.
