>>1555184>doesn't hold heat at allActually, it has a high thermal resistance, which means it's mildly insulative. That can theoretically be a problem when the bottom of the cookware is the thickest, and is also the point of heat transference from your stove. Others have suggested that because of the higher durability, the material thickness can be safely reduced, offsetting the thermal resistance issue, but it still seems like it would result in necessitating carrying more fuel.
Meme-ish, yeah, probably. The weight difference is negligible compared to pissing more frequently and the cost difference is significant. But it still comes down to being a personal choice.
>>1555259I carry one of these because the vertical form factor is a nice dual-purpose shape and most everything I eat while /out/ is soups, stews, rice or hot beverages. It's fine with a fancy feast stove that center-heats water, but for anything else, the small surface area for heat transfer means that cooking always results in a burnt ring in the difficult to reach groove at the bottom.
I've started to cook nothing but rice and coffee in mine and go dehydrated everything else. It's kind of a bummer to have your cookware determine your meal choice.
>>1557944>Look betterI don't really feel that that's the point.
