>>1558873Nah he called himself a 'superfascist'. He was active in both Germany and Italy during the fascist/nazi years trying to sell books and shit, and worked for the Germans during the war.
I would consider the early (at least until '34, maybe until '39) National Socialist German Workers Party NSDAP a left wing party if you ignore the racial hierarchy and the party hierarchy that the modern left uses to disqualify them. So in civil society for ethnic germans it was 'left wing' imo, and a very 'progressive' party since they wanted rapid change in some areas and didn't mind erasing older cultural mechanisms to achieve it. The Italian fascists stemmed from similar far left national syndicalist.
Evola & co. were in contrast far right conservatives with their belief in absolute hierarchy and segregation as desirable states of society indefinitely and with their notion of rapid societal change as always being negative. These ideas influenced both later nazism and fascism for a variety of reasons (mostly strategic ones) and turned late 'applied' war time nazism and fascism increasingly right wing over time even though the theoretical base was hypocritically 'leftist'.
So Evola and his clique are part of the far right hierarchy promoting intellectuals the modern left wishes all of nazism always was, which they wish in order to make nazifascists the absolutely pure bad guy nemesis raison d'être of the absolutely pure good guy left. That said he was still not a christlover or a moralist, or an imperialist really AFAIK, which are also aspects attributed to the 'far right nazis' of todays left wing filtered history books and discourse.
