>>1604746>so lacking in survival threads or discussionBecause muh survival discussions have no value unless you have experienced it irl. It's a sterile discussion consisting of fantasies.
>gear, clothing, hiking or if some retard can eat some shroomgear faggotry is a thing and even on /out/ there are lots of people who are consumerist retards that don't actually /out/ so they have to create threads that suit them.
Hiking is self explanatory, besides fishing it must be the most common activity /out/ists are engaged in, it's only natural people will want discuss it.
>I never see any talk of Bushcraft, or outdoor survivalPeople here understand, for the most part, the concept of LNT, that's one of the reason. The other is that not many here own land to practice it. Go watch that stuff on youtube.
Again /out/door survival has nothing to discuss unless you get exposed to it, having a bunch of cunts rambling about shit they never experienced first hand makes no sense. It hurts me to say but it's the twenty first century, your survival consistes of a locator beacon, it will do you better than any shit you'll read on the internet.
Realistically /out/ is for venting, shitposting and comfy personal anecdotes. Sure cool shit can be discussed but it fades away when people start writing what they have just read elsewhere. It isn't explorersweb or bushcraft forum.
