>>1636036>>1636046This is all ignoring the sinister implications of the greenhouse effect model. If the effects of industrial activity and consumption now are going to cause a catacylmic event in the future the moral hazard and human nature would prevent the free market finding a solution. Man made climate change is a made up issue to undermine the free market. The only solution to greenhouse effect climate change is extream state tyranny to dictate who can consume what, who can have children, what can be produced, where you can go, what activities you can do. Those who push for action against climate change are Totalitarians, and by whiping the population up they have got the sheep begging to be slauted. The saying that 'environmentalists are like watermellons, green on the outside, red on the inside' is true. On paper there is nothing more conservative than environmentalism, yet anti co2 is an entierly left wing movement.
If man made climate change were real it would requier global governence to solve, transnational treaties and laws would have to supercede nation soverenty to ensure that no one is free riding on the rest of the worlds efforts.
Requiering such centralisation of power and bringing up such poltical conflicts of resource allocation it is obvious why man made climate change lends its self to conspiracy.
Is the environmental movement white genocide, global communism, the new world order? I don't know but its interesting to examine the funding of ALL the studies that back up the hairbrained green house hypothesis
