>>180029>I called you myopic because you are short sightedand I'm saying that you are tilting at windmills.
>if everyone made field expedient shelters while hiking and camping we would have a forest with no branches, moss, or fernsnow we are back to the slippery slope fallacy....
moss and ferns grown and reproduce in a matter of weeks. what you are essentially saying is akin to if everybody collected mushrooms, we would have no mushrooms. that is not true as not everybody is going to collect mushrooms and also not true as they would would still have a chance to reproduce.
>the beauty if unspoiled wildernessyou forget that people ARE a part of the wilderness. your term "spoiled" is offensive. placing sticks together to make a shelter is not spoiling anything more than if a beaver or bird did it.
>That impact occurs a single time versus everyone cutting down a bunch of trees or limbs when they want to make a shelterthat "impact" occurs daily in nature with or without humans.
>Field shelters are also inferiormaybe the way you make them...
>making a good watertight one takes a lot of time and energyI ain't got much else to do except that and jack off to the glory of nature.
>ruining the aesthetic value of the landwhich is completely subjective.
~beaver cuts down a tree for no other reason than to eat its bark:
the beauty of nature...
~person cuts some lower branches off a tree to stay dry:
deforestation...
>Every bushcraft site I've ever come across has had trash left theresubjective, anecdotal, and small sample size. how in the fuck did you know it was a "bushcraft site"? did they carve "BCUSA" into every fucking tree?
>Are you calling me Jewish?no, I'm calling you a zionist shill
>Is this supposed to be an insult?yes
>You're not doing much for your credibility implying there's a global Jewish conspiracy.post the names of the heads of every multi national bank and corporation, so we can see.
