>>1784420we need to go back
>>1784371This. Agriculture is okay when its not contextualised as an industry, its fruits commodities, the land a resource. What Heidegger would describe as an enframing mode of revealing, where the land reveals itself as standing reserve to be exploited.
Agriculture as artisanship, caring for the soil and plants in a reciprocal and personal relationship, is acceptable. Not for money, but for what's real. The problem with enframing is that we are slaves to it, and in our hyperreality, we are slaves to abstractions. A *job* for *money* to pay for *bills*, *rent*, *debts*, so that we can *buy* our basic needs and more often than not, pure wants. Compare this to a world that cuts out the middle steps, one in which needs are met under one's own complete autonomy, where the methods by which those needs are met are basal and real rather than abstractions. You need heat? you chop wood. You need food? you farm a plot and go hunting.
