>>1839345What makes it frustrating is that people are hilariously uninformed (intentionally so) about the subject and confuse two different ideologies in their head.
1) They think right-wing dictatorships like in Latin America during the cold war are "fascism", but they were just authoritarian capitalists.
2) People confuse and think fascism, national socialism, British fascism, etc. are different ideologies. Honestly I prefer the term: third positionism, since it leads to less confusion.
3) There's many morons that don't understand that third positionism is all about unity, what unifies that people is irrelevant. The German national socialists were unified by blood, the Romanian iron guard were unified in Christianity, the Mexican synarchists were unified in "la Raza Dorada" (the Golden Race) which is what they call their unique blend of races, the Spanish falangists were unified because they claimed "we are a people with a shared past and a shared future, you know a Spaniard when you see one". It has nothing to do with being "le pure 100% Nordic blood!!!" or being a LARPagan.
4)
>So are you saying American neonazis and even most of the old alt-right are retards. Yes. Without a doubt.
As far as the name goes. I've heard some people call it Nat Eco (national ecologism) which I think is a better name, because so many people horrifically misunderstand third positionism. Deep ecology is the name of pressing environmentalist position, not the ideology.
