>>1854075You need to look at this symbolically, as our current understanding of the universe is based off of our shared experience of the heavens. We can only foresee surface level issues that his starlink constellation will cause, such as ground based observatories being useless now. We cannot foresee the psychological impact or any other impact that this will create, as we are only in the early stages of this problem.
Unfortunately however, as shown by the increase in Atheism, decrease in history (other than history from 1939 onwards), and by your low iq comment, the ability of people to understand symbolism is all but eradicated.
Sure, there may be more important issues out there, but other issues are not what this thread is about. Go see the stars for yourself and then you may have a greater understanding of what im saying. If youre within 20 miles of any city or town, there is too much light pollution and that won't count.
We/you won't care about what is being destroyed until its gone. Do future generations even deserve to see the stars in an unviolated manner?
