>>1983853You have great nature in most countries, there are just too many people living in most of Europe, pic related. So it depends on what you seek. For a medium sized country, NZ has among the best biomes but a rather boring fauna.
I would argue that Chile is one of the top 10 countries but a lot of the population wants to become another corrupt socialist shithole, I wonder how it will look like in 20 years.
You will have great outdoors but hunting with a gun is very difficult - you will limit yourself to a bow (which would be fine for me). Costa Rica is very keen on protecting it's national park, so hunting is very limited either.
If you want to have everything legally and have all the benefits of a functional state then try to get into USA/CA/AUS/NZ.
In other poorer, semi-corrupt countries hunting would work, even if it's not allowed.
Either way all the western nations are cucked, there is no general escape.
It is much easier to escape the decline in rural communities in North America than in the heavily urbanised Europe where the rural areas are often just some kind of suburb.
You would be able to find a local job in most countries, but getting one that offers you at least a east European living standard will be difficult in most places.
If you want a tropical climate and play it easy then try the oversea areas, such as French Polynesia, French Guyana, etc.
I wouldn't settle somewhere where I'm not interested in the local culture and cannot speak their language.
