>>2247140>>2247140>Less moving partsLike what? The trigger? By the time the trigger fails once, you have already replaced the rubber 50 times.
>The rubber band is easier and cheaper to replace.Easier is debatable. You use tools to replace a string on a crossbow, so yeah. Without those tools, it is easier. Cheaper, not so much. A single replacement is cheaper for the slingshot, but a string lasts significantly longer. Also, if the string fails you aren't risking going blind.
>If the handle does break, they are also cheap and easy to replace/ make.Now that is accurate, but doesn't really justify all the dowsides.
>no, the arms ofYes, you have a point there. I never denied that slingshots are cheaper. Unless they take out of one your eyes that is.
>subjective.No. Unless you have sand on the rails and don't lubricate them, the string will outlast many sets of rubbers.
>easier to draw when needed, easier to put back away when not needed.Not related to the question. The answer that relates to my question is just you admitting to crime.
>a bad one that will last you 100 shots max. I know, I bought one.Don't buy bad ones then. What does you making bad decisions have to do with anything?
>Shit adds up, what's the purpose in spending more when you don't have to?The purpose is the superior weapon. Why doesn't everyone buy the cheapest Chinese car available? Get real, faggot.
>It's childish to spend money frivolously.That's nonsense. Buying the superior product isn't spending money frivolously. Paying reasonable money for a quality product is an investment. Buying cheap for the sake of buying cheap will cost you in the long run.
>Maybe if you just pick up any old pebble.Even less accurate and powerful, fantastic! Of course, it's nice that the ammo is dirt cheap, since you need a lot of it to hit shit. ;-)
>But then I'm spending even moreYes, you're paying for the superior product. See statement about Chinese car.
>>2247142whine whine
