>>236466>37 in tires with portal axles not better than 37's aloneDo I really need to argue this with you?
>Totally missing the point The argument was not about the mechanical savvyness of the design of the 3 axle set-up, it was about the merits of it's physical abilities. Your shitty argument about "Hurr less reliable" is moot. (Not to say it's not right, it just doesn't change what we're talking about)
>Only way is 1000lbs axle Not even close, but nice exaggeration. Also a tri-axle set-up has it's advantages over a 2 axle/6wheel get up.
>Then why not just get a 4x4 one? You obviously don't get the point of this ridiculous luxobarge do you?
>Diminished capability No he's not, he's paying to have an insane V12 Mercedes 6x6 with every accommodation you can wrap your plebeian little brain around.
>Strawman Please, Please for the love of god name me ONE, just one other vehicle you can trudge through a jungle, and then without a single change pick up a gorgeous woman for a night out in the city? Please, do that in your F350 anywhere but Texas and tell me it went over better than it would with the Merc.
>This pickup argument Dude, I DRIVE a fucking f-150 with herk-a-der tires on it, but I DO NOT have any misconception that it's BETTER than a fucking half-million dollar benz.
You realize that "But I can modify cheaply any other vehicle" argument is worthless here right? If you gave me a million dollars, I could make a Nissan Leaf go 250 miles per hour. But you know what? It'll never be as comfortable, reliable, good looking, functional, practical, reasonable, enviable, desirable vehicle as the Veyron is. So I don't care what you could "Modify" to make better, that's the real strawman argument here.
Furthermore,
>If I took a 40,000 dollar truck and spent 25% of it's total value on modifications Yeah? Well if I take a 400,000 dollar truck, and spend 25% of it's total value-.... See where I'm going with this?
