>>2349756Just because you say it's 600$ doesn't make it a 600$ book. That's such a silly retort.
I never said I can't afford a 600 dollar book. I never said 600 dollars in the original discussion.
Making silly presumptions about someone, that are wrong, and fixating on those fake realities that you made to prove your argument correct is such a silly line of thought.
I said link me the book; which couldn't be done. So I said when there isn't the ability to have a physical copy, then a scan is fine. This is all a counter to "No e-books please"
That's all there is to it.
