>>2375192>>2375194Why should I give you anything close to a serious reply at this point?
>Why do you think the tree should be removed.>It isn't unhealthy>It is well established>No tree is clean or well behaved--how are you not simply replacing one problem with anotherI explain all of this in detail here
>>2366065>>2366072And you didn't reply to any of it outside of saying I used too many words. I then offered you an opportunity to articulate why you think it should stay and the extent of your argument was that because it has green on it that it must be healthy. Which you also don't seem to understand how ignorant that sounds.
I then gave you an opportunity to actually say something that shows you know something about soil reconstruction and succession after claiming I know nothing about it. You outright refused.
I also told you that if you wanted me to take you seriously at all that you should identify your posts as I did and which you still refuse to do. So if you're trying to convince me you're not just some paid off ESL troll here to ruin the board you're not doing a good job.
And again it's very, very interesting that you claim all this knowledge and that you retired at 30 because you're a financial genius
>>2362467 (if that isn't you, say where you started replying) and taught yourself dendrology. And yet you have all these insults about my yard and business but won't show any clear photos of anything. It's not that you won't show your yard it's that you can't because you live in some basement or Korean apartment complex and are raging out of jealousy.
By the way all that "garbage" is is because we re-use and upcycle as many intended single use items as possible. So if an old water container someone threw out can be used as early spring cover we do that. Sorry if it offends you but I couldn't care less.
>I'm not trying at all to troll. Bullshit. If not, identify every post in this thread and show me an actual photo that shows yours
