>>2423625>only for people who consume large amounts of pufa or are generally unhealthythis meme again
Pufa or not UV radiation corrupts DNA in your cells and this messes up their reproduction. Do you think space agencies put astronauts on zero-PUFA diets, or go the much more costly route of protecting them from UV with clothing, filters and sunscreen?
People in some of the longest longevity countries have been consuming PUFA in mass quantities
It's abundant in olive oil, early grains and most cold water fish, staples in european hunter/gatherer and agrarian diets. You're telling me we didn't evolve with these?
Post your Ray Peat article like clockwork
Yes, getting sunlight is essential, it's likely why nords are blond (maximum sun absorption and vitamin D synthesis), but it's still a deal with the devil especially in places with damaged ozone layers.
>>2424105https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/p8548d/eli5_what_causes_stimulants_such_as_adderall/decent introductory explanation
make sure you understand the common scientific consensus before you start reading esoteric epic secret easter egg redpills
>>2423209dermatologists and cancer specialists agree that it has to be as high SPF as possible (50+), thick enough to visibly obscure the skin (think of the surfers, climbers and skiiers with white noses and lips) and regularly reapplied to really have any chance of stopping cellular corruption
>>2423511yes!
>>2423512Or still go out and avoid skin cancer?
>>2424662I appreciate your sentiment but you haven't shown a single reasoned argument, it's all heresay, flawed logic and gut feelings and your sample size is one - yourself. I've never died in a motorcycle accident / from smoking / eating only processed meat, therefore I'm qualified to tell you they're all fine activities? Sorry to say this but that's a pretty typical approach to advice common to your generation
