>>2422339>>2422339Your arbitrary 10 to 20° ranges on an arbitrary and silly scale don't make you a good cook shit for brains. I can do the same thing just as eaily with the same amount of digits in celsius. What are decimal points?
>for instance - breads tend to be finished around 200-210F93.3 - 98.8
>yeast proofs at 100-110F37.8 - 43.3
>custards are done around 165-185F depending on how firm a set you want. 73.8 - 85.
>I bet ur a cooklet!I actually cook quite well, thanks. And bake quite a bit too, my ranges are pretty similar to yours but I think any human who does something repeatedly can figure out ranges of temperatures that work. My point is the scale is pointless and outdated, like all imperial measurements.
B-but mine are nice big whole numbers!! Congrats on being easily impressed by arbitrary numbers. I would imagine you legitimately get a little hard when you see someone gets dubs, because whoa repeating numbers!
>>2422344Obvious, elementary school information not relevant to why you use a scale designed for people who measured everything by their feet not realizing feet could be different sizes. Like the different imperial systems from Europe all had different sizes for what a foot was when they tried to codify this shit. It could not be more retarded. Accept that your forefathers and education failed you lol
>>2422353All of three of your rationalizations literally boil down to, "I can't cope with the idea of even trying to understand how the entire rest of the globe functions daily." I use A/C too you dumdum, I can feel the difference between setting it at 21 vs 22 'for sleeping.'