>>2475525>You never see this IRL.Well of course I know him, he's me!
I'm being a bit facetious, but not much. I'm sure there will be anons who think I'm lying about this, but I don't see what I have to gain from shilling genetic attraction kek. I'm 6'3", pale, light hair, light eyes, medium frame and have never worn any of the big billboard-brands (obviously I didn't dress like an actual hobo either, but I wore all kinds of eccentric unfashionable shit). I have high cheekbones, good jaw, deep voice, assertive mannerisms, all the usual goodies that women like. I've never made more than a school teacher's salary, nor had any ambitions of doing so. The only thing that would signal wealth would be that I have a decent classical education, but I don't think modern women would actually associate that with money. I have had dozens and dozens of perfectly good looking fit young women (a few models, even) from across the Indo-European world. When I met my wife, I was wearing no-name sneakers, crudely DIY'ed pants-into-shorts, a blank tshirt and a blank baseball cap, and hadn't had a professional haircut in a decade. It's possible that I'm signalling some wealth cue without realizing it (and without having any wealth), but I doubt it.
>bestialityKek, that seems about right. However, remember that some women have mental illnesses and get abused as children too, so this is not necessarily different from a man wanting to fuck a child or another man.
>they assume the dog has moneymy sides
