>>2487879>Antares doesn't fly crew.So what? That wasn't the argument. You said the US was using "russia shitcan from the 60's" which it's not
>Not an orbital class rocketIf you're talking about orbital launch vehicle, then yes it is, that's also what Musk's rocket is classified as.
"The DC-X, short for Delta Clipper or Delta Clipper Experimental, was an uncrewed prototype of a reusable single-stage-to-orbit launch vehicle"
Doesn't matter anyway, as your argument was that propulsive landing had never been done before, when it in fact have been, you can look up project Morpheus if you're really curious about propulsive landing. But leave it to Musk fans to be amazed over old tech wrapped in a new shiny packet
>Just don't talk about space stuff if all your knowledge comes from youtube and reddit posts.That's incredibly ironic coming from a musk fan