>>2518067do you find human bones in the wild? only if an inexperienced hiker gets lost and dies of exposure, then you may find their bones. but i think naked humans would be harder to find, it's the clothes that get in the way of most scavengers which keep some of the body around for search and rescue to identify.
scat could look like bear.
if this is a group animal that travels in family units they are likely very far back into the woods to avoid people, they probably hear people from over a mile away and just move on to avoid them. the pg footage is unique in big foot research because they packed in on horses, rode up a dry river bed and went to a location where loggers had previously reported a lot of aggressive / territorial activity (so the story goes) - their plan was to cast the footprints that were left behind, capturing an actual figure was serendipitous.
look at modern day hoaxers, they don't bother riding miles into nowhere on horses or concoct a story of scrambling to film, and then getting just fragmentary footage that is this good. the fact that nobody in over 60 years has reproduced anything as good as this makes it seem stronger as the time goes by, if it was faked then, surely someone would put in the effort (and the 10-20k) to fake a modern version of this. if only for a laugh.
>the suit is incredible but wasn't visible in detail for a long timeso they packed in this elaborate suit but filmed it for seconds and the rest of their footage is just b roll of them riding on horses, why not carry more film and film different scenarios instead of just big foot walking away and looking back.
>maybe they filmed a lot more but the suit looked shit so they never showed that footagecould be.
