>>2586608>corporation wants to broaden advertising>hires consultants, often outsourced>consultants look into established research>they review opinion polls, social trends, and analytics from the likes of Pew, Gallup, Ipsos, etc.>all of the data tells them to go full anusWhy is there a disconnect between the analytical data from large think tanks and the perceived opinion of the people? There are a few possibilities.
>1. We’re wrong, and the data is rightThe entirety of the uncensored internet is wrong, the entirety of the right wing is wrong, all true Christians and Muslims are wrong, all actual conservatives are wrong. People love child trannies, want their teenaged daughters to chop their tits off, and think a man eating his own semen from the rectum of another man is a sign of pure love.
>2. The data is wrong, and we’re right Double barreled questions render a poll useless. Vague or leading questions can be interpreted however the pollster chooses. Faulty samples are an obvious problem in a country as ideologically diverse as the US (2,000 people from San Francisco don’t represent the views of people from West Virginia). Or just straight up falsified information.
Internet analytics such as Google Trends are influenced by porn, which accounts for ~25% of all internet searches. When you filter out pornographic terms, the remaining words are the innocuous lesbian, Asian, ebony, gay, and transgender.
The largest customer of companies that predict social trends is the US government. We already know the government stance on the topic; they’re pro-anus. I’m not sure how a think tank could remain non-partisan on a study of LGBT issues when anal sex between men is the ultimate moral code of the organization paying for the research.
