>>269720>any tailor or pro costume designer could customize a suit that like for someone assuming they started with the right fucking ingredientsNo they couldn't, see
>>269669Planet of the Apes came out in 1967 and their constumes didn't look half as believable as the thing in the Patterson footage. To make a suit that detailed and complex would require substantial capital, and it's highly unlikely that Patterson had that kind of money, nor is there any evidence that he ever purchased a suit/materials for constructing a suit.
>>269735>especially with the amount of people searching for themthis is a misconception, besides the reality shows like Finding Bigfoot, no one, literally NO ONE is getting paid to search for Bigfoot. There are very few people who have the time or resources to travel to the most remote parts of North America to search for clues of Bigfoot's existence.
>>269748There are miles and miles of uninhabited wilderness in just about every state. You also have to realize that, yes, there are Bigfoot hoaxers, but that doesn't necessarily disprove the existence of Bigfoot altogether. Let's say for instance that there's a total of two Sasquatches living in the state of Georgia. Assuming they stick to remote areas, it would be highly unlikely that anyone would ever find physical evidence of them, yet it would still account for the sightings, noises, etc.
>>269756>where did the rest go?it was just a hypothetical situation
>if we hunted them then we would have much more evidence that we doFinding Bigfoot shows != hunting for Bigfoot
