>>2649129It's on the wiki page with sources.
There's a shitload of websites that cover what I posted and much more.
He rented the camera and was literally scouting locations to film a "documentary" on bigfoot, complete with actors and costumes.
He was sued because he kept the camera for a couple months longer than he was suppose to.
What was he doing with that camera all that time?
Trying to get a "believable" shot?
Did he have to wait until the weather matched what he filmed so he had to hold onto the camera?
If you actually look into the facts surrounding the "incident" its obviously a scam.
Bigfoot was his entire life.
He took people on "bigfoot tours"
He gave speeches on bigfoot.
He was facing bankruptcy.
He finally saw a bigfoot, had it on video.
To him this would have been the most valuable object on the planet.
But he just gave it to his brother in law and said "go get it developed somewhere" ?!
