>>2690375Societal constructs are not to be mistaken for real existence, they are tools and can be used to achieve a certain end but they are not objective reality because the do not exist independent of human invention.
He absolutely died on his own terms because he chose a course of action that had those consequences, and as terrible as it was it beats the hell out of a life in the rat race saving up for retirement and dying having lived the same day over and over again in the names "Mentally Healthy" and "Mature".
There are dudes who live out in the woods and are no less fulfilled then someone who lives under the rule of industry, the only difference is they don't have a bunch of people who will agree with them and reinforce their neurotic illusion that their technological existence is objectively passable as "All that life is".
You advocacy of help for the "mentally ill" is nothing but a stagnate morality designed to euthanize the human spirit, when the reality is that the way of life you speak of is the very thing that causes so called mental illness.
>"Preventable health conditions." Everything is a preventable health condition, but at a certain point you have to overcome that neurotic postponement of death and do something thats worthwhile to you. It's better to live a few years on an adventure that you chose then to die in some dead end job full of unsatisfied regrets.
If thats the life you've chosen brother then more power to you, you're completely justified in living it if it's meaningful to you. But that doesn't mean it is that way to other people. If you advocate experiential singularity of any kind in putting down people who can and do set out to live a different life then you're a total cocksucker.
To take responsibility for our existence we each stake our lives on a course of action with the wager of death, the greatest improvement is setting out to do something thats true to you.
