>>2804169It's kind of funny because in the US it is basically the exact opposite. You cannot trespass on fields or land (despite what Kentucky anon said, yes it's technically not illegal to trespass unless there's keep out signage posted, but there ALWAYS is unless it's just like a vertical slope you couldn't access without a rope, even in the remotest of places)
BUT
if there's a waterway, you can always be on that even if its on private land and its the ONLY place you don't see no trespassing signs everywhere because the right to fish creeks accessible off a road is mostly honored.
And there's some weird hikes where theoretically you could get to it, but have to take a boat in to access it where it is public land. And of course, the forest service doesn't care and will never tell the landowner to fuck off and let people access the land.
>>2804140but specifically a lot of the interesting views and waterfalls are either themselves on private land or only accessible through private land
or nobody would care nobody is just trying to go through random parcels to bother people and leave trash, they are trying to see nature and enjoy it
>You've never been to any popular tourist hiking area in the US thenthat's just like not having trash cans everywhere and having a lot of foreign tourists who don't care cuz its not their country.
I am talking about remote wild shit where the only thing between you and the view is an annoying sign and there's never anyone there.
>>2804129BASED
I wish more people had this attitude. I do not get why people blindly defend private property and landlords.
>>2804151anon, all the private land is gonna be marked or fenced off, they aren't stupid
>it's not a crime to go on private property unless the land is enclosed or posted with signageirrelevant because there's always signage unless it's inaccessible terrain and if the property owner is a psycho and wants to kill you "i didnt see the sign" won't change their mind anyways
