>>2859177You're actually delusional if you think even half of these invasive plants that you claim to remove are from people bringing dogs outside, let alone "almost all." You're an actual moron.
>>2859176So do you mongoloid. Unless you don't go outside? Yes your hair, skin, and clothes track things with you. No, there are not anywhere near as many dogs being taken outside as there are people. People, wind, and birds are by far greater contributors to spreading invasive species. No I don't care that animals are scared of dogs. Animals experience fear daily. Samefag.
I'm not going to stop hunting and hiking with my dog just because you are loud about your retarded view of what does and doesn't belong in the woods. Cry more
>>2859129Yeah I am very sure it's the dogs' fault that all of these exist. I'm sure that I was totally talking about these hyper agressive invasive species (not that I had already listed an example of these like the Himalayan Blackberry) and I was totally NOT talking about hippie fags that cry if you plant geraniums in your yard instead of geowing corn, squash, and beans like the noble red man that always lived in perfect harmony with nature and not only would never exploit nature but would never ever be responsible for spreading a plant to an area where it didn't exist before. The definition of a native plant is totally not a completely ephemeral concept. Yeah it's totally me that sounds naïve.
