>>2858946>It's hard to go against majoritysounds like a woman problem
>You want to live without a carI do.
>Anywhere else you generally can't.You're wrong. It's almost a decade ago that I chose to abandon motorized trnasport and I live in a rural setting. I just cycle to work, I can walk there, did that sometimes, for example when I popped a collar bone or AC joint, but it takes 3 hours to run and longer to walk so I rather cycle.
>jobs are not where homes areI know. That's common. But you have legs and should have strength, stamina and determination unless homo, child, negro, cripple, woman or otherwise degenerate. Idk about those but they make it seem credible there are differences.
Also: In the west you still choose your job. There is a feedback loop. Reliance on fast transport feeds it. You can always prioritize a job closer to home or a home closer to job.
>roads aren't suitable for ridingabsurd.
Maybe get yourself a bike and figure out how those work. Or walk along a road or something and realize why people since before antiquity built those: Because they work. They make everything much faster and easier, walking, running, horse, driving, biking...
>public transportationI'm making an argument against motorism, not for it.
>Buy groceriesThis is so repeptitive: Are you saying the average westerner, with a short (20 km or so) commute, uses their car every day because every day they stop by a shop to buy more groceries than a bicycle carries? Please explain.
I for example fetch my shit on the way back from work, using a bicycle and I only do that once a week, twice max.
>>2858948Mostly true. It's not too inaccurate to just divide global emissions / global gross product and use that figure. More income roughly more emissions. 400 USD a year thirdie ~ not much emissions.
>>2858951How's there a freudian slip?
>completely unviable by slight coldWhy? It's perfectly fine to use a bicycle or walk far below freezing. I do that weekdays every winter.
