>>386024I own quite an assortment of axes, and they all have their pros and cons.
The Fiskars splits very well, but the edge isn't very durable, but then again, it's a splitting axe. I haven't used their chopping axe. The handle is smooth, but it doesn't poorly in the shock absorption department.
Wood handle axe: They weigh more. Generally, the bits are much higher quality and hold a much better edge. They can be restored multiple times if they're not taken care of properly. If you overstrike, you can easily break the handle, but not so much with a fibreglass. Depending on the wood used in the handle, you'll get different characteristics, but they have some flex to them. Because of this flex, they're more comfortable to use and typically have thicker handles. Most handles don't have that well at the end, like the Fiskars has. I also recumbent wearing gloves when using a wood handle. I'm always amazed by the number of people I see complain about splinters because they weren't wearing gloves.
My choice? When I'm out in the woods, I choose what's lightest, most durable and requires the least maintenance. In this case, that would be the Fiskars. It cuts amazingly well, is nearly indestructible and required zero maintenance other than maintaining the edge. It's a tool you can always depend on, given you have good technique and it's an amazing value.
When I'm at home, I choose the classic quality wood handle axe.
