>>482344>Remember we're talking about the tacticool mallninjas, pls. I'm not shitting on AR users as a whole>Exactly, an AR user will spray. A FAL user will not>an AR userGood distinction, not to mention it swings both ways, you can point out a mall ninja AR owner, I can point out a mall ninja mosin owner. Try me if you think I can't, it's not the gun, it's the person behind it.
>And yet you're already planning on using a handful of .223Exhibit some basic reading comprehension please, you shoot until the threat goes down, as fast as you can without being being inaccurate. This applies to any gun, I'd so the same regardless of the tool.
>neglect stopping power just to prove me wrongDo you know what stopping power is? It's a measure of multiple factors, the largest factor being based on penetration, which is why
>By following your logic, I should just use a 22LR, and stop a bear using shot placement only.Is a load of shit as I've already said penetration is very important, which is something .22LR lacks when discussing dealing with bears.
>Also, I think it's a bit presumptuous to say your shot placement will be perfect when you're being attackedOh, I agree, which is why I like having rapid follow up shots so I can get more and more hits in my target.
>I know I wouldn't shoot accurately in the circumstances, so I'd rather use a large caliberSo you're saying you'd prefer to risk missing more, from an already smaller pool of follow up shots, for no reason? Okay, that's one way to word it but you said it, not me.
>>482347>I don't vote by this opinionGood, because it would be a shame if you let your emotions overrule logic like a lot of other anti gunners.
