>>524008From what I got so far, he seems have some good points with the problems connected to GMOs, like weeds and pests developing resistance, toxicity of gylphosate etc.
However he seems to go a bit speculative with the possible effects of GMOs themselves. For example horizontal gen transfer from a GMO to a human (or even from a GMO to a bacterium) does not really make sense. (although I would not generally exclude the possibility)
I don't really trust research by Monsanto, DuPont, BASF Bayer an co. and there are some indications for health problems and it is always possible that there are issues that you are not aware off, until it is too late.
But all in all it is everything but conclusive.
In general, I'd go with laboratory measures when working with GMOs.
Use them for research, but under all costs avoid releasing them into the ecosystem and having safety measures to avoid propagation outside of controlled environment.
The main issues that I have with GMOs remain the chemicals used, the general stupidity of this form of agriculture and the cooperations involved in this buisness.
