>>526002Well I mean it's not that simple you know? Nothing is perfect, if it was it would likely be boring. There HAS to be cuts, there has to be drama, there has to be periods of embellishment to exist in more or less mainstream media. The problem is how he kept going, if he was totally honest about some stuff and people knew it, I doubt anyone would give a fuck, and honestly kudos would be given for at least being like "okay yeah that was blown up a bit."
Instead, like
>>525992 and I said earlier, relaxed interview situations he really shows himself to be this self absorbed shit. I get it, you accomplished a lot, defend those accomplishments, but don't go full James Yeager because you have a bit of value to your name, there are still many other more valuable sources of survival information that have done far more than he has in their respective areas. It's just sad seeing the transition, he seemed so calm and chill on camera, but in Rogans room he was just a straight doucher.
