>>61241>>61245When did I say that "Montana/Wyoming" was "wrong"? Did anybody actually read
>>61003?
>You can do better than this.Asking him to give a better answer doesn't imply that the answer I rejected was wrong, and I clarified in
>>61086 as well.
>60978 is much closer, but it's possible to be much more precise.Please cease and desist all retardation in this thread. I said it best in
>>61206>but if I post a picture of Mount Ranier, the correct answer isn't "either Mount Hood or Mount Ranier," it's "Mount Ranier."There is no reason for you to continue being butthurt about this. He had the region roughly right, but anybody who recognizes the region should also recognize the ridgeline of one of the most famous and iconic mountain ranges in the US. Do you see what I'm saying?
If I post a picture of Half Dome, you can't say El Capitan/Half Dome. It's one or the other, not both, and someone who is familiar with El Capitan should also be familiar with Half Dome, so there's no excuse for not being precise.
