>>670179This is what i mean with ugly design. The logo, the pockets, the fringing at the feet end...
If they would just make that pants much simpler: without the pockets, the logo and the weird feet end. I don't get it, it's easier and cheaper to design them that way, yet no one does it... It's like all outdoor brands deliberately make pants as ugly as possible... Do people really want this? Do people have to wear abominable clothes to declare they hike? Is that the reason?
>>670040This is what i mean with functional and stylish, too bad they can ask 250 dollars for a pair of pants because they are the only ones that are doing it...
